Dedicated live casino table vs shared table: the trade view
Who carries the capex, who gets the branding, and the occupancy arithmetic that decides when an operator moves from a shared table to a dedicated one.
Who carries the capex, who gets the branding, and the occupancy arithmetic that decides when an operator moves from a shared table to a dedicated one.
No per-table price appears in the sources we read: Evolution's H1 2026 release, Pragmatic Play's $15m Bogotá announcement and Kerma's posting.
JPX puts a branded jackpot across games an operator has already licensed, over integrations it has already paid for. The trade is control for ownership: set the name, the colours and the RTP, and you own the liability too.
Trivelta's chief executive files the live casino studio under 'an ambitious product roadmap'; Kerma's own job board is recruiting a live game presenter in Monterrey for a new four-table studio. Terms undisclosed.
Amusnet's live catalogue runs to 32 titles, 27 of them roulette, with live blackjack still under Coming Soon. Against that shelf August's two releases are routine — except for one line neither release makes anything of: on the Romanian table, Amusnet did not run the room.
A Riga live-dealer studio has put its tables and a 6,000-game aggregation API onto a platform that already advertises 150-plus providers. Assessed as a distribution decision: what one integration removes, what the intermediary layer costs, and which numbers neither party has published.
Aristocrat's streaming arm has gone live with BetMGM and Borgata Online, serving 50 physical cabinets and 30-plus titles over 4K video. The trade question is not the title count but the number nobody has published: how many players one cabinet takes at once.
Two named B2B AI-dealer propositions are now in front of operators. One ships a single table in twelve languages on pure revenue share; the other is a milestone-funded build targeting Q3. Neither has published certification.